Abstract: Nepal ranks among the most earthquake-vulnerable countries globally due to the active collision between the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates. This paper examines Nepal’s seismic risk, focusing on structural vulnerability, historical earthquakes, and policy interventions. Recommendations include resilient construction, retrofitting existing infrastructure, mitigation of non-structural hazards, and capacity building. The study aligns with the National Building Code (NBC-105), IS 1893, and Eurocode 8 provisions for seismic design.

1.Introduction

Nepal’s seismic vulnerability stems from its location along the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT), resulting from the subduction of the Indian plate beneath the Eurasian plate. The 2015 Gorkha earthquake (Mw 7.8) underscored structural weaknesses and catalyzed revisions in seismic design codes, including the NBC-105 (2020). Civil engineering strategies must incorporate these codes to reduce risk and enhance resilience.

2. Seismic Risk

Seismic Risk Context Western Nepal presents a major seismic gap. Historical data shows that the region between Gorkha (Nepal) and Dehradun (India) has not experienced a major earthquake for over 518 years, indicating high strain accumulation. Rural structures and urban non-compliant buildings exacerbate potential damage.

3. Historical Earthquakes Major earthquakes in Nepal include:

v  1255 AD – Kathmandu Valley

v  1833 AD – Central Nepal (Mw ~7.7)

v  1934 AD – Bihar–Nepal (Mw 8.0–8.4)

v  2015 AD – Gorkha (Mw 7.8)

Global comparisons include Chile (1960, Mw 9.5) and Japan (2011, Mw 9.0). Historical data highlights the necessity for both structural and non-structural mitigation.

4.Causes and Effects of Earthquakes

 4.1 Causes

v  Tectonic (plate collisions, thrust faults)

v  Volcanic

v  Induced (human activities: mining, reservoirs)

4.2 Effects - Structural collapse - Non-structural damage (furniture, water tanks) - Secondary hazards: landslides, fires, tsunamis

5.Engineering Strategies

v  Resilient Construction Seismic-resistant design increases construction costs by only 5–7% for traditional materials, significantly improving safety.

v  Retrofitting Existing Structures Retrofitting public buildings costs approximately 30% of new construction, enhancing durability and life safety.

v  Mitigation of Non-Structural Hazards Securing furniture, utilities, and decorative items reduces 50% of earthquake-related injuries.

6. Policy and Preparedness Measures

6.1 Assessment and Classification

v  Visual Risk Assessment (VRA)

v  Red, Yellow, Green zoning

6.2 Policy and Enforcement - Extend building permits and inspections to rural areas - Promote lightweight timber construction

6.3 Hazard Mapping - Identify landslide, flood, fire-prone areas - Implement clear emergency evacuation routes

6.4 Education and Capacity Building - Public awareness programs - Standardized emergency drills - Technical training for construction workforce

7. Alignment with Standards

v  NBC-105 (2020): Seismic design requirements

v  IS 1893: Criteria for earthquake-resistant structures in India/Nepal context

v  Eurocode 8: European seismic design guidance for structures

8. Conclusion Earthquakes cannot be predicted, but their impact can be minimized through pre-disaster preparedness. Adoption of resilient construction, retrofitting, non-structural hazard mitigation, and capacity building are essential. Compliance with NBC-105, IS 1893, and Eurocode 8 ensures structural safety and sustainable risk reduction in Nepal.

1. Introduction

An earthquake is a geophysical phenomenon characterized by the sudden release of accumulated strain energy within the Earth's lithosphere, manifesting as transient seismic waves. From a civil engineering perspective, seismic events are critical considerations because they subject structures to dynamic inertial forces that frequently exceed conventional static design loads. A comprehensive understanding of seismic behavior is indispensable for the development of earthquake-resistant infrastructure, the mitigation of structural failure, and the preservation of life and property.

2. Etiology of Earthquakes

2.1 Tectonic Origins

The most prevalent cause of earthquakes is the displacement of tectonic plates along fault lines. As plates interact, elastic strain accumulates; when the applied stress surpasses the shear strength of the rock mass, a sudden rupture occurs. This energy is dissipated as seismic waves. Major tectonic mechanisms include:

Strike-slip faults: Lateral displacement (e.g., San Andreas Fault).

Normal faults: Extensional movement where the hanging wall moves downward.

Reverse (Thrust) faults: Compressional movement where the hanging wall is pushed upward (prevalent in the Himalayan arc).

2.2 Volcanic Activity

Seismic events may be triggered by the subsurface movement of magma. While these earthquakes are typically shallow and of moderate magnitude, they can cause significant localized damage and serve as precursors to eruptions.

2.3 Anthropogenic (Induced) Seismicity

Human activities can perturb the local stress field, leading to induced seismicity. Key contributors include:

Reservoir-Induced Seismicity (RIS): Stress changes due to the weight of water in large dams.

Resource Extraction: Mining operations and deep-well fluid injection (fracking).

Subterranean Testing: Underground nuclear detonations.

3. Categorization of Seismic Effects

3.1 Primary Effects

Ground Shaking: The principal cause of structural damage.

Surface Rupture: Permanent displacement of the ground surface along the fault trace.

3.2 Secondary Effects

Soil Liquefaction: The loss of shear strength in saturated, cohesionless soils, leading to foundation failure.

Mass Wasting: Landslides, rockfalls, and debris flows triggered by vibration.

Tsunamis: Large-scale sea waves generated by undersea tectonic displacement.

Utility Failure: Fires resulting from the rupture of gas lines or electrical short circuits.

3.3 Engineering and Socio-Economic Impacts

Structural collapse of non-engineered or inadequately designed buildings.

Failure of critical infrastructure, including bridges, dams, and lifelines.

Substantial economic disruption and the long-term challenge of urban rehabilitation.

4. Quantification of Earthquakes

Magnitude: A quantitative measure of the energy released at the source, typically expressed via the Moment Magnitude Scale (Mw).

Intensity: A qualitative assessment of the observed effects on the environment and structures, measured by the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale.

Seismic Wave Propagation: Analysis of Body Waves (P-waves and S-waves) and Surface Waves (Love and Rayleigh waves) to determine epicenter location and ground motion characteristics.

5. Significant Global Seismic Events

Year	Location	Magnitude (Mw)	Notable Impacts
1960	Valdivia, Chile	9.5	Highest magnitude ever recorded instrumentally.
1964	Prince William Sound, Alaska	9.2	Significant coastal uplift and destructive tsunamis.
2004	Sumatra, Indonesia	9.1	Triggered the devastating Indian Ocean Tsunami.
2011	Tohoku, Japan	9.0	Resulted in a major tsunami and the Fukushima nuclear crisis.
2010	Port-au-Prince, Haiti	7.0	Extreme mortality rate due to high population density and poor construction

.

6. The Seismic Context of Nepal

6.1. Geotectonic Framework

Nepal’s seismicity is a direct consequence of its location in the middle of the Himalayan arc, a 2,500-km-long mountain range formed by the ongoing continental collision between the Indian and Eurasian plates.

Plate Convergence: The Indian Plate is migrating northward and subducting under the Eurasian Plate at a rate of approximately 40 to 50 mm per year.

Strain Accumulation: Roughly 18 to 20 mm of this annual convergence is absorbed across the Himalayas, leading to a massive accumulation of elastic strain energy. This energy is periodically released through ruptures along major fault lines.

6.2. Principal Fault Systems

The tectonic architecture of Nepal is defined by several longitudinal thrust faults that run parallel to the mountain range. From south to north, these include:

Main Frontal Thrust (MFT): The southernmost boundary where the Indian subcontinent meets the Himalayan foothills.

Main Boundary Thrust (MBT): Separates the Lesser Himalayas from the Sub-Himalayas (Siwaliks).

Main Central Thrust (MCT): Marks the boundary between the Lesser and Greater Himalayas.

Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT): This is the "master" basal detachment fault that underlies the entire region. Most of Nepal’s large-magnitude earthquakes, including the 2015 Gorkha event, originate from the rupture of the MHT.

6.3. Site-Specific Vulnerability: The Kathmandu Valley

The Kathmandu Valley presents a unique engineering challenge due to its geological composition.

Lacustrine Deposits: The valley is situated on a deep basin filled with ancient lake-bed sediments (thick layers of soft clay and sand).

Site Amplification: During an earthquake, these soft sediments amplify seismic waves, leading to more intense and prolonged ground shaking compared to the surrounding rocky terrain.

Liquefaction Risk: The high-water table and sandy layers within the valley make it highly susceptible to soil liquefaction, which can cause heavy buildings to tilt or sink.

6.4. Historical Seismicity and the "Seismic Gap"

Nepal has a well-documented history of catastrophic earthquakes occurring in cycles.

The 1934 Bihar–Nepal Earthquake (Mw 8.0+): This event remains one of the most destructive in modern history, leveling much of Kathmandu and eastern Nepal.

The 2015 Gorkha Earthquake (Mw 7.8): While devastating, seismologists noted that this event did not release all the accumulated strain in the central region, and the rupture did not reach the surface.

The Western Nepal Seismic Gap: A major concern for civil engineers and geologists is the region of Western Nepal, which has not experienced a mega-earthquake (Magnitude > 8.5) for over 500 years. This "seismic gap" is currently under extreme tectonic stress, posing a significant risk for a future high-magnitude event.

6.5. Implications for Civil Engineering

The seismic context of Nepal necessitates a specialized approach to the built environment:

Stringent Code Enforcement: Given the high hazard level, the National Building Code (NBC) of Nepal must be strictly enforced to ensure that structures possess sufficient ductility and energy dissipation capacity.

Geotechnical Investigations: Standardized soil testing is mandatory to identify liquefaction zones and determine the appropriate foundation type (e.g., raft or pile foundations).

Terrain Challenges: In rural and hilly areas, seismic design must account for slope stability to prevent structures from being lost to earthquake-induced landslides.

Year	Magnitude	Region	Impact Summary
1255 AD	Unknown	Kathmandu Valley	Historical records indicate catastrophic loss of life.
1833 AD	~7.7	Central Nepal	Widespread destruction of residential and royal masonry.
1934 AD	8.0–8.4	Bihar–Nepal	Near-total destruction of several urban centers.
2015 AD	7.8	Gorkha / Central Nepal	~9,000 fatalities; extensive damage to World Heritage sites.

 

7. The Role of Civil Engineering in Seismic Resilience

Civil engineers are tasked with bridging the gap between seismology and public safety through:

Ductile Design: Ensuring structures can undergo large deformations without total collapse.

Code Compliance: Strict adherence to national seismic codes (e.g., NBC in Nepal, IS Codes, Eurocodes).

Seismic Detailing: Proper reinforcement configuration to enhance joint integrity.

Retrofitting: Strengthening existing vulnerable structures using jackets, braces, or carbon fiber polymers.

Geotechnical Analysis: Evaluating soil-structure interaction to prevent settlement and liquefaction.

8. Mitigation and Disaster Preparedness

Rigid enforcement of land-use planning and building bylaws.

Implementation of advanced technologies like Base Isolation and Tuned Mass Dampers.

Regular structural health audits of public infrastructure.

Community-level disaster response training and awareness programs.

9. Conclusion

Earthquakes represent a formidable challenge to the built environment, particularly in tectonically active zones like Nepal. For the engineering profession, the objective is not necessarily to prevent all damage, but to design resilient systems that safeguard human life and maintain functionality. Through rigorous analytical methods, adherence to evolving design codes, and proactive retrofitting, the catastrophic consequences of seismic events can be substantially mitigated.

 

1. General Requirements:

Ø Pointing work shall comply with relevant local building codes, regulations, and standards. b. The design and execution of pointing work shall be carried out by a qualified masonry contractor or professional.

2. Materials:

Ø Mortar Mix: Use a suitable mortar mix, which may include cement, lime, sand, and additives, as specified in the design or architectural drawings.

Ø Pointing Tools: Utilize appropriate pointing tools, such as trowels, jointers, or pointing guns, for the application of mortar.

3. Surface Preparation:

Ø Cleaning: Ensure that the joint surfaces are clean, free from dust, debris, loose mortar, and any contaminants that may affect the adhesion and durability of the pointing mortar.

Ø Dampening: Dampen the joint surfaces with water before applying the pointing mortar to prevent excessive absorption of moisture from the fresh mortar.

4. Pointing Techniques:

Ø Flush Pointing: Apply the pointing mortar to fill the joints completely, making the surface of the mortar flush with the face of the masonry units.

Ø Recessed Pointing: Apply the pointing mortar slightly recessed from the face of the masonry units to create a neat and visually appealing finish.

Ø c. Weathered Pointing: Create a sloped or beveled profile on the pointing mortar to deflect water away from the joint and enhance weather resistance.

5. Joint Dimensions:

Ø Joint Width: Maintain the joint width as per the design or architectural requirements, ensuring uniformity throughout the pointing work.

Ø Joint Depth: Ensure that the pointing mortar adequately fills the joint depth, providing sufficient strength and support to the masonry.

 

 

 

6. Mortar Application:

Ø Mortar Consistency: Prepare the pointing mortar to the specified consistency, which should allow for easy application and proper adhesion to the joint surfaces.

Ø Mortar Bonding: Ensure a strong bond between the pointing mortar and the masonry units by pressing the mortar firmly into the joints and ensuring full contact.

7. Finish and Appearance:

Ø Tooling: Use appropriate tools to shape and finish the pointing mortar, such as striking or jointing tools, to achieve the desired appearance and texture.

Ø Color Matching: Match the color of the pointing mortar to the existing mortar or as specified in the design, using suitable pigments or additives if necessary.

8. Protection and Curing:

Ø Protection: Protect the newly pointed joints from excessive moisture, direct sunlight, rain, or other factors that may impair proper curing and drying.

Ø Curing Time: Allow adequate time for the pointing mortar to cure and set according to the manufacturer's recommendations and environmental conditions.

9. Quality Control and Inspection:

Ø Regular quality control checks, such as visual inspections, adhesion tests, and color matching, shall be conducted to ensure compliance with the specified standards and appearance.

Ø Any identified defects or imperfections should be rectified promptly before final acceptance.

10. Safety:

Ø Adequate safety measures shall be implemented during pointing work to ensure the well-being of workers and comply with safety regulations.

Ø Proper ventilation, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and adherence to safe work practices shall be ensured.

11. Documentation:

Ø Detailed documentation, including pointing drawings, material specifications, test reports, and compliance certificates, shall be maintained for record purposes.

Note: This specification serves as a general guideline. It is essential to consult the specific project requirements, design drawings, and local building codes to create a comprehensive and accurate pointing work specification.